Building a Stronger Financial Safety Net for ASEAN+3 in Uncertain Times
February 17, 2025
Global and regional financial safety nets play a crucial role in maintaining economic stability, especially during crises.
February 17, 2025
Achri Anatanarak, Masato Matsutani
Global and regional financial safety nets play a crucial role in maintaining economic stability, especially during crises.
January 9, 2024
The underutilization of CMIM facilities during recent crises highlights the need to reevaluate the effectiveness of ASEAN+3 region’s financial safety net.
January 2, 2024
Argentina first established its bilateral swap agreement (BSA) with China in 2009 to provide a liquidity line of up to ARS38 billion or CNY70 billion (about USD10.3 billion).
December 28, 2023
The Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralisation (CMIM) is the regional safety net of the ASEAN+3 region.
December 12, 2023
Being one of the largest RFAs in the world, the CMIM, with a lending capacity of $240 billion, has undergone continued improvements over the past decade.
November 23, 2022
Andrea Salvador, Chanthevivanh Keobounphanh
The cases of the Philippines and Indonesia are among the reasons why the CMIM has never been tapped.
October 14, 2022
Since 1958, two years after joining the International Monetary Fund (IMF),
September 28, 2022
With a total financing capacity of USD240 billion, the Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralisation (CMIM) is the world’s second largest regional financing arrangement (RFA) among active RFAs, after the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) and much larger than most other arrangements in non-European regions.
February 17, 2022
Extreme liquidity shortage during the Asian financial crisis of 1997-1998 and the global financial crisis of 2008-2009 have motivated some ASEAN+3 economies to initiate bilateral swap arrangements (BSA) with countries either inside or outside the grouping.
December 15, 2021
Conditionality is an essential supplement to crisis financing programs. However, such conditions have long been debated by scholars and policymakers globally, as to whether they promote economic growth and development or undermine the national sovereignty of borrowers and hinder economic recovery.